Torisar For example, a unique code for New Adult was only added in the past year as a direct result of a boom in the genre and a need for better categorization for online and brick and mortar retailers alike. These are A mazon-specific descriptors. The systems can be used individually or together to help determine where the work is shelved in a bricks-and-mortar store or the genre s under which it can be searched for in an online database. While initially intended for its use just in the book industry and bookstores, it was later exported to libraries and other platforms with the participation and complaisance of OCLC and other actors. As a norm, BISAC is released in an annual basis at the end of every year including updates, deactivated codes and changes from the previous edition, making necessary for any institution wanting to use an up-to-date version of the scheme within the system the payment of the fee every year. Book Industry Study Group, Inc.
|Published (Last):||16 June 2013|
|PDF File Size:||12.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.51 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The BISG recognizes that one of the main reasons why the use of BISAC headings for the physical arrangement of books is not officially recommended is because sometimes publishers prefer to use their traditional systems for this purpose. However, an idealistic future in which BISAC headings are printed on books and in the catalogs was also envisioned by the BISG: "Printing the descriptors is a very good idea although not an official recommendation at this time due to the desire on the part of most publishers to continue use of their traditional merchandising syntax.
According to Bole et al. The role of volunteers in setting the standard was highlighted again in by Bole and Harbison, and by Harbison in , although, as Sanford Thatcher noted, this volunteer work is strictly restricted to BISG members and its consequent fee payment Thatcher However, the BISG website also states that if a heading that does not appear in the list is needed, "the Subject Codes Committee considers all requests from members of BISG and the industry at large for topical content currently not covered by the terms in the Headings list" BISG a , emphasis added.
The full revision process and creation of new headings include minor revisions to each main subject area made on an ongoing basis based on need and incoming requests provided that they are "clear" and not "too vague to be discussed intelligently", Harbison , p. As a system that does not intend to reflect the whole universe of knowledge, the number of subject terms of first order has not been stable in time i.
These guidelines showed further efforts towards neutrality and participation in the process of creation of new headings. On the other hand, the aforementioned webcast and the cited surveys that argued for the inclusion of the new headings were filled with the argument of sales as a benefit, outweighting the potential risks and problems of the inclusion. An example of a concrete schedule for this process would be: gauging industry feedback from proposals such as the BISG webcast , discussion of feedback among the Subject Committee, approaching to changes as a committte, discussion of specific headings, and issue of new edition of subjects with changes.
As a rule, the creation of new headings is currently based on five factors Harbison : There should be at least unique titles on the topic published by different publishers ; There should not be an existing heading that is similar and that adequately covers the topic; The suggested heading should describe a topic and not an author, language, audience, etc.
These factors have also changed over time, by there were only three factors considered as listed by Bole et al. The first factor, clearly resembles the concept of "literary warrant," the principle that the Library of Congress applies for the implementation of new Library of Congress Subject Headings.
Literary warrant can be defined as the use of topics in existing publications to justify inclusion of topics in a controlled vocabulary. In the case of BISAC, the inclusion of new headings should fulfill an additional requirement: the existence of at least unique titles from different publishers.
The reason for this is most likely to avoid the monopolization of the creation of new headings by a strong organization specialized in a specific subject, also passing on responsibility to the "market. In this vein, it can be said that BISAC not only follows a market warrant, but the American market warrant, as it is the particular view and interests of the American book industry both publishers and buyers that is reflected on the system.
The Statement of Faith of the Association is as follows: I. We believe the Bible to be the inspired, the only infallible, authoritative Word of God. We believe in the deity of our Lord Jesus Christ, in His virgin birth, in His sinless life, in His miracles, in His vicarious and atoning death through His shed blood, in His bodily resurrection, in His ascension to the right hand of the Father, and in His personal return in power and glory Inactivation of codes and the problem of reclassification Concerning the inactivation of codes with each new release, this aspect was explained by the BISG b as follows: "Codes were inactivated when the literals they represented were deemed to be one or more of the following: Redundant; Not widely used; Easily confused with other subjects; More appropriately listed in a different section" Note: although no longer stated on the website, these statements were also repeated in previous lists of differences between editions since, at least, The second cited aspect, the fact that a code was not widely used, is closed related to the concept of "market warrant" too.
Moreover, the BISG also states that emphasis added : "It is highly recommended that inactivated codes which have already been assigned to titles be replaced [ Therefore, although it is recommended that inactivated codes be replaced by active codes, it is also recognized that replacing all occurrences of inactivated codes might not be possible in practice the old problem of reclassification. This problem is partially solved with the "quarantine" of the inactivated codes, what means that with each new release of BISAC, old books that were categorized with inactivated codes will never mix with other books that have new active codes, since both groups will always have different codes.
The Subject Codes Committee anticipates that most users would not re-categorize backlist. After all, in due time, most titles with inactivated codes will go out of print and the heading [codes] will retire with the books.
Receivers of inactivated headings [codes] have a decision to make. They must decide whether to maintain such headings [codes], often leading to duplication or near duplication within their subject database, or they must re-categorize titles in the database with such headings [codes].
Ideally, it would be appropriate to re-categorize these titles, particularly if they will stay in print for a number of years — although as noted above, we recognize that this is not always practical, especially for users with large databases. Maintaining such headingd [codes] in an in-house database is a viable option. However, if the heading [codes] are to be sent to trading partners, bringing the headings [codes] up to date is preferable.
Recognizing the difficulties of reclassification, a system in which reclassification is not strictly needed is provided. In this case, the market is what, in due time and in a natural way, will retire all those books categorized with deactivated codes.
Despite not being exactly true that it was the first library in the United States to drop Dewey, Perry Branch Library did mark a milestone in the field as the first public library in the United States to adopt the book industry standard BISAC instead of Dewey as the classification system for organizing the collection.
According to Amy Wang, of The Arizona Republic , the conversion plan for the system in the Perry Branch took nearly five years, although county officials say that by it only took from one to two months to make a library Dewey-less. Although a strict adoption of BISAC was used in the beginning, this situation changed and the standard was eventually modified and adapted to the needs of the community as well as to the size and complexity of the collection.
According to Norman Oder , Maricopa originally outsourced all the cataloging for the project, and Brodart, which provided the opening day collection, worked to translate Dewey to the new system. According to Jennifer Miele, of Maricopa County Library District, working closely with vendors is considered a vital part of the project when what is wanted is to add libraries to the BISAC-based scheme in a consortium or system Fister Since its opening, Maricopa County Library District has inspired many other libraries willing to get rid of Dewey and has conducted more than sixty tours for librarians from all over the United States, Canada and South America.
In this study, the authors concluded that one of the biggest assets of BISAC for its survival would be the standardization and centralization provided by the BISG, something that is not always strictly followed by libraries using the system due to the charactistics of the library as an institution.
In addition, several libraries have discontinued the project or reported reverting some of the BISAC features after a not-so-satisfying experience see for instance Barnett Conclusion As a system that is used to organize knowledge i.
BISAC does not follow a facet-analytic approach either, as it is mainly an enumerative and alphabetical system. The development of BISAC is not based on user-based or cognitive approaches, as users buyers are not surveyed and reflected on the system, but the publishers and BISG members express their opinion on what might sell best. It is well accepted in critical circles, that marketing and the market do not always reflect what consumers want, but try to establish trends and dictate what they desire.
Finally, BISAC does not follow a domain-analytic approach either, the interests and points of views of the different communities are not considered. BISAC is a system that is driven by the intuitive knowledge and estimations of the market on potential sales and editorial activities. BISAC is praticalist because it was devised as a practical way to exchange and organize information according to the industry convenience especially regarding standardization and centralization.
While initially intended for its use just in the book industry and bookstores, it was later exported to libraries and other platforms with the participation and complaisance of OCLC and other actors. It might be said that BISAC, in some way, indicates that the initiative of developing new systems have moved from the library sector to other sectors such as the book industry. However, while following the same logic and approaches in its development, as in the case of the DDC and not departing from it as some library adopters enthutiastically believed , it did not take too long to get the involvement of OCLC and other LIS actors.
While the system did not adapt too much to the LIS community, BISAC advocates within the community tried to change the LIS community by highlighting the necessities and benefits of borrowing ideas from the commercial sector.
I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the comments. References Barnett, Andy. Differences between the edition and the edition. Bole, Angela, and Connie Harbison.
About ECPA. Fister, Barbara. Harbison, Connie. Hill, Nanci Milone. Kelley, Michael. Olson, and Margaret Kipp. Morris, Julie. Thema: The new, global subject classification system. Versions of the DDC. Oder, Norman. Olson, Hope A. Schneider, Karen G. Thatcher, Sanford G. Wang, Amy B. Wingett, Yvonne. Version 1. Knowledge Organization 43, no. All rights reserved.
BISAC SUBJECT HEADINGS 2011 PDF
Akinojar BISG updates the list each year. Ideally, it would be appropriate to re-categorize these titles, particularly if they will subnect in print for a number of years — although as noted above, we recognize that this is not always practical, especially for users with large databases. The role of volunteers in setting the standard was highlighted again in by Bole and Harbison, and by Harbison inalthough, as Sanford Thatcher noted, this volunteer work is strictly restricted to BISG members and its consequent fee payment Thatcher Once begun, this small group invited others to join in sponsoring a seminal study of book industry information needs on which a future program could be based. However, the reality is that those libraries adopting BISAC in the United States were dropping the DDC and using the bookstore scheme as a classification system for the physical classification and arrangement hheadings books. It might be said that BISAC, in some way, indicates that the initiative of developing new systems have moved from the library sector to other sectors such as the book industry. This page was last edited on 28 Novemberat Some of these extensions will have bisca for libraries, but currently only the regular subject headings are included in library catalog records.
Akirn Ideally, it would be appropriate to re-categorize these titles, particularly if they will stay in print for a number of years — although as noted above, we recognize that this is not always practical, especially for users with large databases. This is only appropriate for books that cannot be classified e. To test it, I did hdadings Amazon search and came up with over one hundred golf romances! Sadly, neither Las Vegas nor the book happened. One of the biggest assets of BISAC subjdct said to be that the scheme is available online at no cost for one-to-one look-ups.